RED #9
“Every rule has consequences. Every consequence has desire.”
RED #9 is a prestige thriller set inside a world-class law firm where intellect, ambition, and attraction intertwine. Junior partner Portia Calder and enigmatic managing partner Christian Vale balance public victories with private power struggles. Built for vertical bingeing (50 × 2–4 min), every scene sharpens into cinematic precision and emotional tension.
The Firm is cathedral and cage: glass corridors, mirrored conference rooms, penthouse sanctuaries. Reputation is currency; precision is survival. Court by day, confession by night.
- Power vs Surrender: who holds it and how it’s exchanged.
- Control as Currency: the professional mirror of personal restraint.
- Public vs Private: flawless exteriors hiding dangerous wants.
- Ambition vs Desire: winning the case or winning the person.
- Addiction: to precision, to success, to being seen.
Portia Calder
Brilliance polished into armor. A strategist learning that vulnerability can also be a weapon.
Christian Vale
Elegance weaponized—command, charisma, and a fear of losing control.
Elena Morell
Poised mentor-rival; history with Christian that reopens under pressure.
Nadia Quinn
Disruptive charm; equal parts danger and fascination.
Major Arc Overview
- Acts I–III: Discovery → Temptation → Control
- Acts IV–VI: Obsession → Concealment → Exposure
- Acts VII–VIII: Fallout → Reversal
- Acts IX–X: Reckoning → Rebirth
[Use this area to insert full episode outlines]
Origin: RED #9 was conceived as a meditation on control—how ambition, intimacy, and loyalty intertwine behind polished doors. Born from Hive Projects’ “affordable luxury” ethos, it brings cinematic storytelling to modern short-form precision.
Intent: To explore the fine line between mastery and surrender. Each frame is composed like a verdict waiting to fall.
| Act | Case Title | Conflict | Theme | Emotion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Horizon Bank v. Ramos | Corporate ethics breach | Integrity vs Ambition | Loyalty questioned |
| III | State v. McConnell | Defending the guilty | Truth vs Perception | Control tested |
| V | Langford Trust | Inheritance manipulation | Greed vs Legacy | Dependence deepens |
| VII | People v. The Firm | Scandal leak | Power vs Accountability | Exposure mirrors collapse |
| X | Vale & Calder LLP | Disbarment hearing | Reputation vs Redemption | Equality through confession |
Color Evolution: Pearl to Crimson over Absolute Ink Navy. Emotion replaces hue; light reveals motive.
Concept: Minimal analog layers—bowed strings, restrained synth pulse, silence as suspense. References: Hildur Guðnadóttir, Cliff Martinez, Atticus Ross.
| Role | Essence | Reference Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Portia Calder | Controlled intellect → self-possession | Jessica Chastain × Ana de Armas |
| Christian Vale | Magnetism under discipline | Daniel Craig / Jon Hamm |
| Elena Morell | Poised strategist | Cate Blanchett tone |
| Nadia Quinn | Playful disrupter | Zendaya × Eva Green |
| The Intern | Naïveté turned witness | Emerging face |
- I–II → Curiosity • Attraction • Ignition
- III–V → Seduction • Control • Dependence
- VI–VIII → Exposure • Rupture • Reversal
- IX–X → Reckoning • Release • Redefinition
- Platforms: Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video, Max
- Co-Branding: fashion / luxury collaborations
- Release: Two acts per drop; optional feature cut
- Revenue: brand integration, soundtrack, interactive extensions
Philosophy: Cinematic quality × production efficiency—feature-grade craft at digital speed.
Method: Boutique teams, edge-to-edge design, polish in every frame.
Promise: On time. On budget. Beyond expectation.
Festivals: Canneseries Short Form, SXSW Episodic, SeriesFest, TIFF Next Wave, Web Series World Cup.
Focus: Cinematography, editing, and design categories highlighting Hive Projects’ precision aesthetic.